{"slug":"job-description-studio","name":"Job description studio","category":"Human Resources","customer":"HR consultants supporting small employers","problem":"Job advertisements poorly describe actual work.","value":"For HR consultants supporting small employers, turn manager interviews, task examples and approved role requirements into approved job description and role brief. Address the recurring problem: job advertisements poorly describe actual work. The value hypothesis is a more complete, reviewable deliverable with less repeated preparation; the pilot must establish whether that benefit is real.","format":"Source-based content workspace with editorial delivery","screens":"Key screens: Role discovery, description editor, approval view. Use a project list and editorial calendar beside a document editor. Keep original material and supporting passages in a collapsible side panel. Show outline, draft, review and approved stages. Provide tracked edits, comments, version comparisons and an export preview that reflects the final delivery format. In this product, the first view is role discovery, followed by description editor and approval view.","functionality":"1. Extract responsibilities. 2. Separate essentials from preferences. 3. Draft clear outcomes. 4. Check inconsistent requirements. 5. Adapt publication formats. 6. Record approvals.","workflow":"Collect a structured brief and source material, identify unanswered questions, approve an outline, generate a draft, verify claims, gather reviewer edits, approve a final version and export the agreed formats. Start with manager interviews, task examples and approved role requirements and finish with approved job description and role brief.","ai":"Extract and organize information, propose structure, draft prose and adapt approved content to audiences. Attach evidence to factual claims. Keep names, dates, amounts and quoted wording linked to their source. Editors resolve ambiguity and approve publication.","inputs":"Manager interviews, task examples and approved role requirements","deliverables":"Approved job description and role brief","admin":"Client workspaces, source permissions, editorial assignments, change history, reviewer comments, approval gates, revision allowances and export templates.","mvp":"Begin with HR consultants supporting small employers and one recurring use case. Build the first two modules: extract responsibilities; separate essentials from preferences. Provide operator assistance for the third module: draft clear outcomes. Deliver approved job description and role brief through a manual review queue. Perform other necessary full-scope functions manually during the pilot. Include all applicable access, accuracy and professional-review controls from the start.","expansion":"After paid pilots establish value, automate the remaining modules: check inconsistent requirements; adapt publication formats; record approvals. Add one validated source integration, reusable customer configuration and recurring delivery. Expand to additional teams, document formats or languages only after testing the new scope.","usp":"Starts from real work and outcomes rather than generic job templates.","defensibility":"Customer-approved terminology, reusable structures, source libraries and editorial feedback tied to a specific audience and recurring publishing workflow. For this solution, build around starts from real work and outcomes rather than generic job templates. This advantage requires execution and accumulated customer trust; the base model alone is not a defensible asset.","alternatives":"Writers, editors, agencies, internal document templates and general-purpose chat tools. Differentiate on this specific proposed advantage: starts from real work and outcomes rather than generic job templates. Test it against the buyer's current method on the same task. Competitor coverage and uniqueness have not been established.","revenue":"Test USD 400-1,500 for a tightly scoped initial content package. Convert repeated work to a monthly retainer with explicit deliverable and revision limits. Specialist review and substantial research are separately scoped. Prices are hypotheses.","costs":"Research and interview time, transcription, model usage, factual verification, subject-matter review, editing and revisions.","integrations":"Approved HR documents, employee directories and learning records. Document storage, word processor export, content management systems and approved publishing channels. Pilot with uploads and downloadable drafts before adding write integrations. These are candidate integration categories, not verified supported connectors.","dependencies":"Document parsing, a source-linked editor, tracked revisions, reviewer workflow and reliable document export. Rich presentation or print output needs format-specific QA.","pilot":"Complete one existing brief using the customer’s actual sources. Record reviewer edits, factual corrections and preparation time. Ask the same buyer to commission a second comparable deliverable. For this solution, use manager interviews, task examples and approved role requirements and evaluate approved job description and role brief. Agree success thresholds with the buyer before starting; collect a baseline for manager acceptance, application relevance. A positive signal is payment and repeat use with acceptable quality and delivery cost, not a favorable demo reaction alone.","plan30":"Week 1: interview five prospective buyers in this segment: HR consultants supporting small employers. Ask to see a recent example of the problem and their current process. Week 2: prepare this demonstration using authorized or synthetic material: a role clarity rewrite from a manager interview. Week 3: present it through HR consultancy communities and seek one narrowly scoped paid pilot. Week 4: review manager acceptance, application relevance, total delivery effort and a concrete renewal decision before increasing scope.","metrics":"Manager acceptance, application relevance","channels":"HR consultancy communities","leadMagnet":"A role clarity rewrite from a manager interview","message":"Job description studio for HR consultants supporting small employers. Starts from real work and outcomes rather than generic job templates. Demonstrate the claim through a role clarity rewrite from a manager interview.","retention":"Maintain the approved source and voice library, schedule recurring editorial work, and expand into additional formats only after the core deliverable is repeatedly accepted.","controls":"Keep employee data access explicit and confidential. Use human judgment for personnel decisions and do not infer protected traits or hidden personal characteristics. Validate source access and reviewer availability during the pilot. Maintain customer-level access, data deletion controls and a record of final approvals.","crossSector":"Education; Operations; Writers","fn":["Extract responsibilities","Separate essentials from preferences","Draft clear outcomes","Check inconsistent requirements","Adapt publication formats","Record approvals"],"sc":{"opp":7,"pain":6,"feas":8,"now":8},"phases":[{"name":"MVP","scope":"One buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: extract responsibilities; separate essentials from preferences. Manual review in the loop.","time":{"days":3,"label":"3 days"},"usd":6500},{"name":"Paid pilot","scope":"Accounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.","time":{"days":4,"label":"4 days"},"usd":7000},{"name":"Full product","scope":"Remaining modules: check inconsistent requirements; adapt publication formats; record approvals. Self-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.","time":{"days":7,"label":"7 days"},"usd":9500}],"running":[{"stage":"MVP and paid pilot","note":"about 3 customers","hosting":[30,60],"ai":[70,140],"total":[100,200]},{"stage":"Full product","note":"about 50 customers","hosting":[110,210],"ai":[700,1400],"total":[810,1610]}],"total":23000,"complexity":0.22,"days":14,"shot":true,"demo":true}